Co-operation with:,,,,



Guest book

Book recommendation

WebBlog for transverse philosophers

Training video for school, occupation and hobby VIDEO: “Instructional films”


Co-operation with: climatic-research, nature-protection, Die "Kolbatz-Theorie" zur Klimaerwärmung

- Climatic Research -

Info.: The “Kolbatz theory” for climatic heating up

 - Climatic change with forces of nature -

Forschungsprojekte von Prof.h.c.. Dr.h.c. Klaus-Peter Kolbatz

© Copyright: International Academy of  Sciences for Climate Research


Section 1

climatic news
Conditions of the science
Review smog 1952

Measures against smog

Climatic heating up continues to rise.

Retreat of the scientists


Section 2
A cause microwave 


Transmitting power warms up the air molecules

Chlorgas and ozone hole

Chlorine alkali electrolysis

9000 satellites

Problem solution

Antw. v. CBM Professor Dr. Töpfer

The Haarp project

Attack on a radio station

High frequency weapons

Nuclear/Hightech weapons

Before it humans gave.





Climatic change

Glaciers melt

Antarctic melts

Tree die

Whales strand 

Diversity of species

Forces of nature

Rain Mach he/silver iodide

Solar winds/polar lights


Our contributions to the nature protection “muna 2003:

Klimaerwärmng “muna 2003”

Roof planting “muna 2003”

Tsunami “muna 2003”



Hurricane interactive

EL-Nino interactive   

Weather kitchen Iceland

Flash storm the USA

Nuclear reactor


Planet system

Polar lights



Section 3
Scientific studies


Brain damage

92V on the brain

Blood picture 

Portable radio

Skin cancer

Blood-brain barrier

Dr. Reinhard Munzert

Rem sleep/stress sleep

Burn out syndrome

Nuclear reaction/energy





pool alarm

Web Design


child protection

Iraq war part of 4

Iraq war part of 5




Kolbatz “book corner”

Now buy!

AGAIN! Is the climatic heating up by industrial exhaust gases a duck!? Capital crime at our children.
Klaus Peter Kolbatz…
Only EUR 35,00!
Uses EUR 30,00
 Burn out syndrome - Infarkt of the soul - Burn out syndrome
Klaus Peter Kolbatz…
Only EUR 19,90!
Uses EUR 14,14

to the Warenkorb

Child education

Klaus Peter Kolbatz.

Only EUR 16,90

AGAIN! June 2007

War children - hail of bombs survived, career made and with Burn out paid!

War children

- Burn out with paid -
Klaus Peter Kolbatz…
Only EUR 19,95

It harms that I

knocking off did not invent…
Klaus Peter Kolbatz…
Only EUR 10,12!

shop “” Incapacitated and geplündert.
Klaus Peter Kolbatz…
Only EUR 35,90!
Sponsor: Proceeds from the sales of the books “capital crimes at our children” and “Burn out syndrome - Infarkt of the soul - are made available by the author for the climatic research.

© Klaus Peter Kolbatz


Biography of Kolbatz



Dear readers!

Allow me the opportunity to advance an idea up to my already busy since 1959. I lived then in the immediate Further the MW transmitter Rias Berlin and was out of the coal in the kitchen listening to the radio. With the Ofenklappe I regulated the volume.

The explanation for this was the high power (even with the 40 W light bulbs were burning) and coal dust in the furnace. Here, the coal dust, the RF signals into audible signals NF.

To what extent is the world today (pulsed) microwaves in conjunction with, for example Components of an active volcano, and also rising sea salts arrives, has not yet been explored. I assume that the water-coated particles, in particular by pulsed microwaves to vibrate and thus produce heat. See also the "Kolbatz Theory" below.

I assume that by electromagnetic waves, sea salts is converted into chlorine gas and so harms the ozone layer. That I had in 1988 and also demonstrated (in the excerpt) published on my homepage.


The process begins at the nanoscale and is in a sort of "domino effect" transferred to larger molecules. See the VIDEO (11.866KB): "As the ice melts" and the VIDEO (6.145KB): "domino effect".


Thank you for your attention.

Klaus-Peter Kolbatz

Kolbatz says: "We are currently an experiment, which we have no control".  "The greenhouse protection are counterproductive and promote global warming."

The UN strikes alarm. Aluminium Gore also participates. Merkel, Bono, Beck anyway. And Sigmar Gabriel has Knut, which zoo adopts small sooo sweet polar bear in the citizen of Berlin. Probably before it is too late.

At present so rather each politician has world-wide one always the same opinion for climatic heating up: Everything completely badly, rather still more badly.

Whole army crowds of scientists forecast the inundation of the Netherlands. Desert landscapes in Central Europe and also Knuts threaten used will allegedly become extinct.

“Exaggerated, unscientific, immoral” now mean renowned scientists opposite MIRROR TV. The authors Steffen Haug and Dirk Schulze spoke among other things with the Meteoroligist Professor Hans von Storch (University of Hamburg), the atmosphere researcher Professor John Christy (University OF Alabama), the Paläoklimatologen Professor Augusto Mangini (University of Heidelberg) and the evolution biologist Professor Josef Reichholf (DO Munich).

Thus Augusto Mangini of the University of Heidelberg at Stalagmiten researches. Over a complicated scientific method it can make the climatic data quasi archived in thousands of years the old lime deposits readable. Mangini has for example for the part of the world climatic advice report, which concerns the reconstruction of the Paläoklimas, a substantially differentiated view on the things: “We have data, which show that there were periods, which were similarly warmly or even still warmer than today during the last ten thousand years.

For this the scientist and author of the book “capital crimes at our children”, say Klaus Peter Kolbatz that itself the climatic changes during one period of several 100 years gradually changed and nature sufficient time had to adjust itself on that. 

Today we have to do it with a climatic heating up, which rose within approx. 20 years around at least 7 degrees.

I cannot also understand why CO2 a pollutant to be am, said Kolbatz in 1988 on the IENA888. It is nevertheless the basis for all life on this planet. Without CO2 there is no growth. And with increased concentration the plants grow clearly better. Before some millions years there was as can be prove a CO2 concentration 5 times higher was than today. More carbon dioxide gases in the terrestrial atmosphere protects also against sunning effects, as with the outbreak of the volcano Pinatubo 1991 was proven. Center twentieth century were in the winter -35 degrees the rule and the scientists and politicians spoke of an ice age beginning.

Thus the greenhouse theory is no longer durable and it never gave thus also for the atomic energy a right of existence. Reactor accident in Tschernobyl

Today, the "Kolbatz theory" confirmed and 31,072 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,021 with PhDs

List of Signers By Name - All 31,072 Total Petition Signers in US

List of Signers By Name - All 31,072 Total Petition Signers in US (pdf)

Environmen tal Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

Document to Petition (pdf)

Global Warming Petition Projekt, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine.

Environmen tal Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide.

Also Professor John Christy of the University OF Alabama belongs to the critics. The renowned climatic researchers in numerous ecological studies of the United Nations participated. With its team Christy evaluates extensive data from the atmosphere of our planet. The information about ozone concentration and temperatures supplies satellites and weather balloons. Christy opposite MIRROR TV: “Our newest study shows that the temperature in the atmosphere increases.

Kolbatz operates 1988 climatic research since beginning and forecast already at that time the climatic heating up by the drastic increase of the transmitters. It is the opinion that transmitter frequencies particularly shift in the microwave range the air mole coolness in oscillations and the following in our large Big bread ago house „earth “- take place:

Here the “Kolbatz theory” for climatic heating up in the excerpt:

The world-wide need for information (mobile telephones and Sateliten TV), our security needs (military equipment) and our orientation need (government inspection department), created a global network at transmitting plants only in the last 20 years, which radiates electromagnetic waves in the Gigahertz-Bereich in enormous extent into the atmosphere. Until before 20 years there were only temperature innocuous very high frequencies and short waves. We generally call gigahertz waves microwaves. Transmitters, mobile phones and computer processors actually work in the same frequency range as the microwave oven in the kitchen. In use and achievement they differ. In the effect not at all.

Each microwave brings all molecules with a dipole character (main liquids) to swinging, whereby these warm up. The more achievement, the faster and more warmly. „“Our kitchen technology supports „the scientific proof “for it daily.

The achievement of the entire global communication technology is not sufficient, in order to bring us all to cooking, but there is practically no more microwave-free area on this earth. The radiation consists of pure energy, which hurries with speed of light by area and atmosphere and works so long thermally, as it is measurable. Billion oscillations per second let each water particle in air along-swing inevitably and warm up. The entire atmosphere contains more waters than oxygen and heats up thus by microwaves. The momentary energy quantity is quite enough for a heating up around 2 - 3 degrees Celsius.

Since there are no more microwave-free areas, no more temperature can be measured without its influence. The microwave influence is however - due to the described effect - largest with high air humidity.

Thus the temperature in an artificial atmosphere must be compared with high air humidity and the actual environment. Long-term measurements of Karl-Heinz Sander (Baunatal) prove the acceptance that under permanent microwave influence the temperature in the atmosphere rises, because in the artificial, damper atmosphere he always measured a higher temperature than in the actual ambient temperature. The fact that with equal high humidity both atmospheres had also the same temperature occupies the acceptance. When all measurements with different humidity the results of measurement deviated however up to 3 degrees Celsius from each other. Also when measurements with other media, by microwaves (steel wool) was the same remarkablenesses is influenceable to be observed.

The temperature differences depend much on the location and on differences in height. In altitudes over 400m the object temperature (artificial atmosphere) lies by 3 degree over the outside temperature. In higher situations the propagation of the microwaves takes place more unhindered than for example in valleys. 

When measurements before 20 years, when television and mobile telephone did not work yet in the Gigahertz-Bereich and/or still no surface covering was reached, these differences were by the way higher than today. This observation confirms the theory. In no case the temperature in the artificial atmosphere was lower than in the ambient air. Series of measurements over days, hours and even year occupy higher temperature differences with remarkable humidity differences and smaller with humidity equality.

The process of the temperature is interesting circles with consideration of the increase of microwave users in this connection.

© Klaus Peter Kolbatz

Literature: “Capital crimes at our children” ISBN3833406240


Development of the microwave use

Until 1987 was gigahertz waves only in the military and civilian radar far common. Significant effects could be recognized up to then in direct proximity to transmitting plants.

1988 began the 1987 into space shot first branch RA satellite its transmission activity for the satellite-to-receiver telecasting. In the meantime there is alone 13 branch RA satellites and a multiplicity of further in other systems.

At 1991 the D-net began, in 1992 reached it a recognizable surface covering.

1993 were government inspection department operationally, 1995 world-wide surface covering with 24 satellites were reached.

1994 and 1997 went the two E-nets in the mobile telephone range to the start.

1995 were introduced the DECT standard for cord lot telephones, which spread since then rapidly.

Briefly after the turn of the century W-Lan and Bluetoth were increasingly used in cross-linking by electronic devices.

1987 were thus the last, relatively microwave-free year. The comparison of the average temperatures from 1901 is significant to this year, with around approximately 20 years the longer time interval until 2006. Thus the time in the microwaves substantial increased: In the time of 1901 to 1987 the average temperature runs absolutely evenly. That is, it did not take place the smallest heating up.

Only including the time period of 1988 - 2006 become that clearly, which admits as climatic change is. Now the linear trend line rises clearly and reaches a difference of 0,8 degrees in this period.

Without the microwave-strong years starting from 1988 the trend would by the way have run downward in the late 60's, that 70's and the early 80's. The jump in 1988 (satellite-to-receiver telecasting) and at 2000 (*UMTS) begins to draw the trend line above then after „“.

(more *Über 50 billion euro had to transfer the six UMTS licensees in August 2000 at Ministers of Finance Hans Eichel.) 

The scientists are itself as far as possible united that the global heating up is a fact. It takes place already, and it is not a natural occurence, but the result of our acting. The signs are overwhelming and do not leave themselves to not denials.

We experience already changes. Glaciers melt, plants and animals from their territories are driven out, and the number of heavy storms and dry periods increases.

(According to the statistics on specialized telecommunications company Mobile Data Association (MDA) was alone in the UK in September nationwide in 4825 billion SMS sent Converted according to MDA, this corresponds to the transit of 4000 SMS per second)

The CO2-Al-Gore-Lie !?  Germany Strikes Back! -

It says everything that we the atmosphere not by CO2 but by our now ubiquitous microwave heat up further. Mr. Kolbatz provides for a coherent model and said: "In our large Big Brother house" Earth "- plays, in principle no different than in a microwave in our food warm."



von Klaus-Peter Kolbatz


Electromagnetic waves produce vibrations and heat the air molecules!


Today, with news and other satellite broadcasting facilities, the Earth's surface almost coverage beflutet.

This, in the last 50 years dramatically high transmit energy, bring dynamism in the complex climate Done!.

Just one of many examples: The Hamoun-See in Iran is within only 25 years dried up. Both satellite imagery derived from the same city. The left picture was 1976, the right-2001.
(The electromagnetic wave (transmitting energy) creates a vibration. This vibration is an air molecules to * nanoparticles * (about 1 nm (1 millionth mm) up to about 100 µ m) party and puts them into vibrations. Makes it faster air molecules move, the warmer it is. (micro-wave symptom)) A warmer atmosphere leads to increased water cycle. "Warmer air masses take more water vapor. Therefore, more water for precipitation available. "Other areas are the long dry.

The air molecules around the clock in swing. So even really a night where natural cooling temperature should occur. With the result that the morning temperature baseline is already higher than it otherwise without sunlight would lie.
* Nano-particles, or nano-particles called a composite of a few to a few thousand atoms or molecules. The name originates their size, typically from 1 to 100 nanometers. A nanometer is 10-9 = 0.000000001. This corresponds to the size of Earth and a football. The prefix 'nano' comes from the Greek "nanos" for "dwarf" or "dwarfish".

Nanoparticles can be both natural (such as volcanic eruption or forest fires), as well as by anthropogenic (man-made) effects (such as automobile and industrial emissions) in the environment.
Already already *1988 has Kolbatz alarm beaten and said this: "With the increased CO2 emissions have actually a slowdown. However, these ingredients to electromagnetic waves in swing and generate heat in the atmosphere takes place. We need to grapple with global warming expected to have significant consequences "....> 


  * The "Kolbatz theory" was first on the IENA88 in 1988. Can be in a book with the title "It is a shame that I did not invent knocking off", ISBN-10: 3898115240, issue October 2000.

© Klaus-Peter Kolbatz 1990  



by Klaus-Peter Kolbatz and Olga Stradysheva

The proposed research is focused on the energy efficiency public awareness campaigns in Germany. The core objective of the project is to find practical solutions and develop recommendations based on German and European experience that can lead to an increase in the energy efficiency awareness and stimulate innovation and sustainable growth in this field. Russia is now facing a number of challenges in creating, implementing and reviewing its energy efficiency policies, which cannot be addressed without application of European, and particularly German, best practices. These challenges are related to adopting appropriate institutional and procedural arrangements, creating awareness and encouraging responsible behavior on the national level, securing regional, national and international collaboration, prioritizing and concretizing actions, formulating a coherent vision and agreeing on a path for long-term development.

Russia can save 45 percent of its total primary energy consumption[1]. Russia’s current energy inefficiency is equal to the annual primary energy consumption of France. Achieving Russia’s full energy efficiency potential would cost a total of $320 billion to the economy and result in annual costs savings to investors and end users of about $80 billion, paying back in just four years. Benefits to the total economy are much higher: $120-150 billion per annum of energy cost savings and additional earnings from gas exports[2]. Russia would require investments of over $1 trillion to construct energy supply facilities to generate the same amount of energy while energy efficiency can achieve the same effect at a third of the cost.[3]  Not only will this contribute to addressing the challenge of climate change, but it will significantly improve Russia’s international image and help Russia to reemerge as a leader in addressing global environmental issues.[4] 

[1] Energy efficiency will allow Russia to: Lower budget expenditures: $3-5 billion can be saved annually from federal and local budgets by eliminating the inefficient use of energy; Maintain competitiveness: As rising tariffs diminish the world’s largest energy subsidy ($40 billion in 2008), profits of industrial enterprises will decrease by at least 15 percent. Energy efficiency will allow companies to maintain competitiveness; Increase oil and gas export earnings: Russia’s energy intensity has a cost of $84-112 billion per year in terms of foregone export revenues; Reduce environmental costs: By ignoring the consequences of emissions caused by its energy intensity, Russia sacrifices the health and welfare of its citizens and roughly $10 billion per year in direct economic benefit from selling CO2 emissions reduction units.

[2] By realizing its energy efficiency potential Russia can save: 240 billion cubic meters of natural gas, 340 billion kWh of electricity, 89 million tons of coal, and 43 million tons of crude oil and equivalents in the form of refined petroleum products.

However Russia faces a number of obstacles. First of all, Russian general public and Russian policymakers have not yet fully embraced the concept of energy efficiency. As evidence of this fact, there exists no coordinated, defined national energy efficiency strategy or policy, nor any dedicated authority responsible for improving energy efficiency. International experience has shown clearly that, in the absence of any concerted national policy and clear political leadership at the highest level, energy efficiency measures are unlikely to enjoy much widespread success. Russia has shown some intent to make energy efficiency more of a priority, but these efforts have been scattered and without any clear path to implementation. The government has issued a law on energy saving (Federal Law No. 28), included energy efficiency in its energy strategy, and established a Federal Targeted Program on Energy Efficiency (Federal Target Program “Energy Efficient Economy” for 2002-2005, with prospects to extend to 2010). The Federal Law and energy strategy are largely declarative. The Federal Targeted Program focused its funding primarily on the oil, gas and nuclear sectors. In addition, as a result of administrative reforms energy efficiency has largely been omitted from the responsibilities of the federal government. The absence of a cohesive, enforceable strategy for improving energy efficiency in Russia may not be the root cause of energy inefficiency in Russia, but it is the most important issue to address in order to initiate and demonstrate the government’s commitment to energy efficiency.

Current federal and regional legislation on energy efficiency is largely declarative and does not address key barriers such as lack of information and insufficient access to long term funding. Measures to remove these barriers and stimulate uptake of financially viable energy efficiency projects are essential to realizing Russia’s energy efficiency potential and avoiding the consequences of continued high-energy intensity at higher tariffs. Thus strong leadership is required to enable energy efficiency investment. Achieving greater energy efficiency requires that many individual decision makers gain comfort in investing their capital in projects to use energy more rationally. A strong government role can provide that comfort by removing barriers, establishing clear conditions and standards, and supplying critical information. By creating a “pro-energy efficiency” business environment, the government can catalyze significant investment flows.

Evidence of a lack of appreciation for energy efficiency can be seen in the culture, values, and social norms of all regions and across social groups in Russia. Russian industry managers and business owners consistently underestimate the energy savings potential of prospective energy efficiency investments. Roughly half of Russia’s potential energy savings can already be achieved through financially viable investments. Yet even financially viable investments have slow uptake. For example, in the manufacturing sector, 80 percent of energy efficiency potential is financially attractive, but a very few companies take advantage of all those opportunities.

It is clear, that people need motivation and leadership to change their cultural perspective and daily habits. Energy consumption is a passive and invisible process. Most consumers only interact with the costs of their energy usage, and implicitly, the benefits of their energy savings, when they pay their monthly utility bills. As such, consumers tend not to associate their behavior (i.e. their energy consumption) with its relevant costs on a daily basis. Resistance to energy efficient actions is also still high in business and public environment. Many companies are hesitant to adopt practices unless they are generally accepted in their respective business community and many professionals are reluctant to promote energy efficiency projects without support of company leaders. 

[3] The forecast shortfall of natural gas production (35-100 bcm by 2010) and potential gap in additional electrical generation capacity (~20,000 MW) can be compensated by energy resources released through increased efficiency (240 bcm of gas and ~43,000 MW of electricity capacity. 

[4] Russia’s energy efficiency potential translates into a CO2 emissions reduction of 793 million tons of CO2 equivalent per year (about half of 2007 emissions). If its energy efficiency potential was to be fully realized, Russian CO2 emissions in 2030 would be approximately 20 percent below the 1990 level.

Russian society has yet to reach its energy efficiency “tipping point”. People are more likely to follow the lead of those around them. Even when an action, like the adoption of energy efficient measures, has proven personal utility, studies have shown that individuals are more likely to act similarly if they know their neighbors and peers are doing it as well. However, in Russia there is not yet a critical majority that accepts and appreciates the value and benefits of energy efficiency. As a result, the majority of individuals, companies, investors, and public officials are not willing to take the risk of investing time, money, and will power in energy efficiency initiatives. This, however, is doubly harmful to energy efficiency, as the lack of initiative at the individual level creates a society-wide standstill in which there is no consensus that something needs to be done about the issue.

A general lack of awareness about energy efficiency among businesses and consumers is one of the greatest obstacles to investments in energy efficiency in Russia and throughout the world. This lack of awareness lies at the root of many of the behavioral obstacles described above. Industry professionals and individual consumers alike lack the knowledge required to find and invest in energy efficiency. Russian banks lack sufficient knowledge of energy efficiency investments to offer financing for such projects. As noted in previous sections, former President and current Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has indicated that under Russia’s leadership of the G8, the summit will prioritize the topic of energy efficiency. He has also clearly indicated the need to increase energy tariffs for regulated services (electricity, gas, and heating) to full cost-recovery levels. Since his inauguration, President Medvedev has also made several public statements identifying Russia’s inefficient use of energy, and the associated economic and ecological consequences. If such high level leadership is translated into policy, the policy implemented as law, and the laws implemented in the form of funding or enforceable regulations, Russia may well be able to effectively reduce its energy intensity. Concerted and coordinated action will be required on the part of Russian policymakers if Russia is to achieve its energy savings potential. Experience from European countries like Germany  have, in particular, shown the importance of political will and coordinated action in creating a national ethos geared toward energy saving.

Individual households, companies, and public organizations need to be equipped with the knowhow and provided the expertise to carry out energy efficiency investments. In addition, information dissemination can raise general public awareness and acceptance of energy efficiency practices as necessary and socially beneficial decisions. Information dissemination campaigns can come in multiple forms, but need to be tailored to the end-user in order to be effective. Such campaigns can include: advertising campaigns on energy efficiency, energy labeling of appliances and equipment, advice on equipment and behavioral practices, education at schools, and interactive expert advice through audits. Whether or not the government is directly involved in the information dissemination, such campaigns are often funded with government support.

Thus, the main research questions are:

a)       What kind of public policy tools provide the best incentives for energy efficiency? 

b)       What determines the efficiency of the public policy communication process?

c)       How to find the right balance between different interest groups?

d)       How to make the economic effects of environmental protection more transparent for decision-makers and the public?

In order to get answers to these questions, the research will be structured in three main directions of analysis: analysis of policy concepts and road maps, analysis of institutional structures, analysis of internal and external communication mechanisms. The following methodology for collecting data will be used: expert interviews, expert seminars, content-analysis of official documents, analysis of official publications, participant observations.

The expected results of the project include: a number of publications and presentations with analytical reviews; a university study course syllabus; a set of recommendations for decision-makers in the legislative and executive branches of the Russian government, as well as for Russian think-tanks, non-governmental organizations and private enterprises; expert seminar that will bring together experts from both German and Russian regional and national institutions.

There are several reasons for conducting the project in Germany. German initiatives for energy efficiency are very valuable for Russian experts and politicians[5]. First of all, energy efficiency is an issue of current importance in Germany and the EU but it is not yet developed in Russia. I am especially interested in examining experience of DENA (German Energy Agency) in developing private-public partnerships for supporting national, regional and local energy efficiency campaigns.[6]

 Secondly, the practical German experience in establishing and promoting the energy efficiency strategy and public awareness campaigns is very useful for Russia. The chance to obtain access to some of these primary sources and analytical conclusions can substantially enrich my research and expertise. Thirdly, the opportunity to contact German experts and scholars working on the problems of energy efficiency awareness improvement. Finally, it is desirable to look at the work of German public authorities responsible for the promotion of energy efficiency and to study the strategies they use to improve public awareness and the accountability to the public and people's motivation to participate. Germany is also known as a country where the government tries to strike a balance between various interest groups and between federal and sub-federal levels. These are important areas of expertise that Russia can acquire from Germany.

While staying in Germany for 12 months, the activities listed below will greatly assist me in conducting the proposed project. Firstly, the opportunity to examine the performance of state institutions in Berlin and German regions for one year is indispensable for finding practical solutions and recommendations that can strengthen the development and implementation mechanisms of the energy efficiency policy development in Russia. Secondly, I am planning to cooperate closely with the academic community of Germany. Access to leading research centers in Germany dealing with problems of public governance and energy efficient economy would also assist me in conducting the proposed project. I would like to be involved in seminars and conferences on the problems of energy efficiency and to organize presentations and discussions on Russian energy efficiency policy.

This project is important for achieving my professional goals. My future career goal is to become a leading public awareness expert at the Russian Federal Agency on Energy Efficiency that is planned to be founded in 2011. I have already gained practical experience in advising regional governments and leading corporations on energy efficiency campaigns. Since the beginning of 2008 I have been working at the International Finance Corporation (World Bank Group) specializing on developing and implementation of Russian regional and corporate energy-efficiency improvement strategies. Project results will be used to provide senior Russian policymakers with a comprehensive and practical analysis of energy efficiency awareness best practices and potential, benefits, and recommendations on how to fully tap into this resource. My previous experience of cooperation with the Administration of Nizhniy Novgorod and Kamchatka regions shows that results of my projects will be helpful for improving their energy-efficiency policies. 

[5] On behalf of the Federal Government, the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi) issued a national Energy Efficiency Action Plan in November 2007 line with the 2006 EU Directive on energy services and energy end-use efficiency. The plan sums up the results of the national energy summits, the energy efficiency actions of the Integrated Energy and Climate Change Programme and underpins the aims of the Coalition Agreement by reviewing the present energy efficiency policy and proposing and/or amending additional 32 energy efficiency measures covering all sectors. 

[6] As of the end of 2007, the Initiative EnergieEffizienz is supported by DENA, who has also the project lead, and the energy companies EnBW, E.ON, RWE and Vattenfall Europe, and is sponsored by BMWi.

The proposed project will also contribute to the development of academic scholarship in Russia. There are not enough Russian scholars who devote their work to the problem of energy efficiency and sustainable development. The results of the proposed project will form the basis for publications in academic journals and for presentations for students, political leaders and general public. I am going to use the results of the project to design a new university course that I am planning to teach directly at the Moscow State University. Besides direct teaching, I am also interested in organisation of cross-regional conferences and public lectures, where scholars from several regions can bring their combined findings to the attention of social activists, local political and party leaders, and all others who are interested in them. 

Klaus-Peter Kolbatz

Titiseestr. 27

D-13469 Berlin

Excerpt from publications and internal correspondence (pdf):
The HAARP project, capital crimes against our children v. Klaus-Peter Kolbatz
Clean air heats Europe - By Volker Mrasek
Is global warming gases emitted by industry a duck? v. Klaus-Peter Kolbatz
Mobile towers heat the Earth-Climate! by Sophia Iten
From the dust of Aerosol Research
The Gulf Stream as an engine for our global central heating v. K.-P. Kolbatz  

Information on research projects by Klaus-Peter Kolbatz

Patents by Klaus-Peter Kolbatz

VIDEO "climate research info"

VIDEO "natural disaster"

VIDEO "climate change"

VIDEO "Movies"

VIDEO "storms "

VIDEO "Glacier"

VIDEO "Tsunami"

VIDEO "Chernobyl"

VIDEO "Antarctica"

VIDEO "smog-1952"

VIDEO "forest fires"

VIDEO "air molecules"

VIDEO "stranded whales"

VIDEO "clouds vaccination"



  3) VIDEO mobile 


  5) VIDEO mobile blood-brain

VIDEO "How to actually melt the ice?"

Biography   1989th    Books    Customer reviews    Research projects    Publications    Psychology    Contact    Links

LITERATURE / Extracts:

2. Auflage, burn-out syndrome, ISBN: 9783837065213

 Here you can find the most helpful reviews from customers see more .....>>

Burn-out syndrome. - Infarction of the soul - Psychology & Help. Business & Careers. 2. Edition - as I made my inner emptiness came back out -. Kolbatz Klaus-Peter, Book on Demand - 184 pages Release Date: 2008, ISBN: 9783837065213;

In the book browse

Parenting. - Pro and Contra "creche" - . Klaus-Peter Kolbatz, Book on Demand - 132 pages Release Date: 2007 ISBN-10: 3833498900


Extract 'war children' Children of war - bombs survived, career and with burn-out pay. - Klaus-Peter Kolbatz, Book on Demand - 180 pages Release Date: 2006, ISBN, 3-8334-4074-0


Capital crime against our children - the business of Destruction -" -. Kolbatz Klaus-Peter, Book on Demand - 328 pages Release Date: 2004, ISBN: 3833406240


Das Buch Deadline bei Books On Demand Das Buch Deadline bei Das Buch Deadline bei
Das Buch Deadline bei Das Buch Deadline bei
Das Buch Deadline bei Das Buch Deadline bei Das Buch Deadline bei

You are a journalist and want to write about the book?

For your journalistic work, you can BoD online

Free review copies ordered.

Special "climate"
 Custom Search

 Special GDR history "

 Custom Search
special "health"
 Custom Search
The number of hurricanes of the category 4 and 5 doubled itself in the last 30 years nearly.
Malaria arises now also in regions lain more highly, e.g. in the Colombian Anden, to 2,000 m over the sea level.
The meltwater of the glaciers of Greenland doubled itself in the past ten years more than.
At least 279 planting and animal species react already to the global heating up, by withdrawing themselves in the direction of the poles.

If the heating up continues, we must count on catastrophic consequences.

The deaths due to global heating up will double themselves in only 25 years - on 300.000 humans per year.
The sea levels could rise according to aluminium Gore world-wide around more than 7 m, connected with the shrinking of the shelf ice in Greenland and in the Antarctic. Coastal regions in the whole world were destroyed thereby.
Heat waves will arise more frequently and more intensively.
Dry and devastating large area conflagrations become more frequently.
The arctic ocean could be ice-free up to the summer 2050.
More than one million kinds could have become extinct until 2050.


Certainly we can solve this problem. We are even morally obligated to it. Small changes in your daily routine can add up to a large change and contribute to it to stop the global heating up. Now the time came to solve the problem together. - IT NOW ASSET!

Their co-operation is in demand!

Ihre Firma:
Ihr Vorname / Ihr Name:
Ihr Beruf:
Ihre Strasse:
PLZ / Ort:
Ihr Land:
Grund Ihrer Nachricht: Ich habe eine Frage
Ich habe einen Vorschlag für Ihre Seiten
Ich habe eine Kritik anzubringen
Ich möchte in Ihrem Team mitwirken!
Ich möchte mein Wissen mit einbringen!
Ich möchte für Klimaforschung spenden!

Gewünschter Kontakt: eMail
Nicht notwendig.

Vertrauliche Mitteilungen senden Sie bitte an


Klaus-Peter Kolbatz

Titiseestr. 27

D-13469 Berlin


(Formular-Service vom Formular-Chef)

further to the “Kimawandel”